THE CHANGING FACE OF RECRUITING - Part 1

                                                                                           by Catharine Aradi
                                                                                   www.fastpitchrecruiting.com

Many key elements of recruiting and the college search process have remained relatively stable over the past ten to fifteen years.
But, there are some key elements that have changed--or at least shifted--and these are things parents definitely need to know. I’ll
look at one of those changes here and follow up with others in later articles.

Until eight to ten years ago, most coaches, regardless of the level they coached at, did the majority of their active recruiting after a
player’s junior year.  While the elite athlete--someone like a Jenny Finch or a Keilani Ricketts---would be pursued and might commit
to a Div. I college before her junior year, this was definitely the exception rather than the rule. And while early commitments--e.g.,
those given before the middle of a player’s junior year--are still statistically-speaking the exception rather than the rule (see note), the
number of players who decide on a college while still freshmen or sophomores has increased dramatically.

Note: It’s extremely important for parents to understand that in any given graduating class, no more than 10-15% of all the students
who eventually go on to play softball at a 4-year college will actually give an early commitment. So while it may seem like every
parent and travel coach is telling you it’s all over for your athlete if she hasn’t committed by her sophomore year, the truth is over 80%
of students won’t decide upon a college until their junior or, in many cases, their senior year.

However, this particular shift in recruiting trends necessitates what I now call a two-tier approach to the college search.  If a player
really wants to find out if she might be a candidate for a strong Div. I program, she needs to get on that coach’s radar by her
sophomore year.  Unfortunately, not all athletes mature at the same rate, and many players who might be solid Div. I prospects by
the time they are seniors may be overlooked simply because as freshmen or sophomores, they weren’t as physically or
experientially mature. (This is a perfect example of my first law of recruiting--e.g., it’s not fair!)

Using this two-tier approach, many, if not most players who send out letters and resumes with video links, transcripts and schedules
during their freshmen or sophomore years will have to repeat the process--expanding their target zone to include more Div. II, Div. III,
and NAIA colleges--again as juniors. So college search that used to be focused on an athlete’s junior into her senior year may now
be stretched out over most of her high school career. It’s a bummer, but that may be what it takes for you to find the right college and
team.

In my November-December column, I’ll look at other major changes that have shifted the recruiting landscape in recent years.




                                                                                                      © Collegiate Softball Connection 2014